So… the launch of UN Women…was okay.
My ticket only got me into the overflow room where I had to watch the goings-on on a big projector screen. It worked out in a sense because I had made friends with a woman from Germany while standing in line waiting to get into the room and we sat together and dissected what was being said during the program. She was a graduate student studying International Relations at some NYC university and an intern with an environmental NGO, so our backgrounds were different as could be and it was great to see and hear things from a different perspective.
But back to the event proper.
Thirteen people spoke, including Michelle Bachelet and Ban Ki-moon, but Christiane Amanpour wasn’t around because she got called overseas to do a news assignment so another ABC anchor stepped in and wasn’t near as eloquent. All the speeches were variation on a theme: UN Women is great and we’re going to do great things!
One thing that was interesting however was the presence (or not) of A-list celebrities. Geena Davis, Shakira and Nicole Kidman were all listed on the program and Geena Davis was the only one who showed up in person. They were all introduced as having a deep conviction for women, girls and the work of US Women, yet two of the three couldn’t bother to show up. Shakira provided a recoded message and Nicole Kidman was brought live through satellite from her movie set in San Francisco, but when the feed was lost half way through her maybe 5 minute speech, they didn’t bother to try and fix it. (Not to mention that she has more money than God and if she was totally committed to the organization, she could have left her movie set for a few hours, flown to NYC and been back all in one day).
in theory, UN Women is a great thing. In terms of fitting into the UN, it would be like having a cabinet position in the US government. The group has direct access to Ban Ki-moon (and his successor) and can potentially get some real work accomplished for women all around the globe.
But there we go speaking for others again. Ideally, women at the grassroots level are going to voice their wants and needs to their allies with power who are then are going to be their voice within UN Women. Then UN Women will propose resolutions to the UN as a whole, countries will vote to approve and sign (or not sign) the resolution and positive change will be made. I just don’t think it’s that simple. We’re using the master’s tools to dismantle the master’s house, to paraphrase Audre Lorde, and change doesn’t come like that.
And beyond just speaking for other, UN Women never really try and complicate what they mean by the term “Women.” And, unfortunately, I think one huge assumption they make is that “women” equates straight. The emcee for the evening even made a comment that Ban Ki-moon had a strong woman supporting him (his wife) and that all the women in the audience have strong men supporting them as well, because otherwise the important work we’re doing would not get accomplished.
There’s also the assumption that women will all have children at some point in their lives. One of the agendas within UN Women is to educate girls so they can avoid being pushed into child marriages and delay pregnancy and childbirth until they are older. While both are noble goals, the assumption is that girls will follow a set pattern which will eventually culminate in (heterosexual) marriage and children.
In celebration of the launch, UN Women commissioned a song and it was performed at the end of the program. The song was titled “One Woman” and the chorus went like this:
“We are one woman/ Your hopes are mine/ We shall shine”
The rest of the song was in the theme of being one woman which, if you can’t tell by now, I find problematic. What bothered me in the song was the last verse, sung by a man, went like this:
“And one man, he hears her voice/ And one day, her fights he fight/ Day by day, he let’s go the old ways.”
I don’t need a man to fight my fight for me. I don’t need anyone to fight for me. I want people to work alongside me to make this world better.
I also don’t like the choice of words in that same verse. Why choose fight? That’s such a masculine, military word with very historically negative connotations. Fight is what you do when dialogue breaks down and there is no other option. There are better ways to advance equality than fighting.
Overall, I think that UN Women has the potential to be very powerful, but I think there needs to be dialogue surrounding “common definitions” and whether “common definitions” are even something that the group should be working toward.
-
-
JuJu Chang
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bon Ki-moon
-
-
-
-
Nichole Kidman
-
-
Her Royal Highness Princess Christina of Spain
-
-
Ms. Rakhi Sahi, Former Commander of an all-female Formed Police Unit for the UN Mission in Liberia